Showing posts with label Google. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Google. Show all posts

Monday, August 27, 2007

Enterprise Search: Google Expands Capacity of Custom Search Business Edition

Good News for Google CSBE fans!! Google announced today that it will expand the capacity of its Custom Search Business Edition. Previously it was only offering two options; 5,000 and 50,000 pages. According to Google, large number of clients have asked what to do if they have more than 50,000 pages. Today Google added two more options to the online Custom Search Business Edition offering. They introduced two new plans that businesses can purchase online:
  1. Search up to 100,000 web pages: $850 per year
  2. Search up to 300,000 web pages: $2,250 per year
Besides If you want to search more than 300,000 pages, contact them.

When I heard first time about Google's new offering, I wrote in my article about pros and cons of having Google CSBE. After a quick reading, I suggested my own company to buy the service and drop the open source Nutch search engine to serve about 1000 pages. Since it was just $100 for less than 5,000 pages, marketing did not waste too much time in buying the search services. Next morning I got a 'thank you' message, saying good things about Google CSBE. It took the marketing manager less than an hour to setup the account and get the search on the website without UI customization. Besides it was less of headache than managing the open source search engine for such a small website. We have also suggested to one of our very large client to include CSBE for their public search. This client has been struggling to support effective search to the public for a very long time. Since its inception, it has switched couple of search engine already trying to meet users expectation. If everything goes right, CSBE will start providing searches for the large enterprises.

I think this is one of the Google's best offerings lately. I think Google Search Appliance is great but Google CSBE is awesome for all types of Enterprises.

Thursday, August 16, 2007

American Customer Satisfaction Index - Google vs Yahoo

There has been so much talks about the results of American Customer Satisfaction Index and how Google slips badly against Yahoo and Ask in search and portal market. I was trying to understand the survey criteria and getting the facts with respect search engine market before adding my 2 cents.

First of all, the survey asked a statistically representative of consumers to rate their experiences with portals and search engines according to a number of criteria, which produces an overall satisfaction score on a 100 point scale. Wait a minute, search and portal. Does any agree with the fact that these are two different technologies and solves different business problems? So the data does not correlate with the search engine market share or portal share market. Why should I and anyone else be interested in ACSI results? Is it because there are major player in the fray for the top spot? Would it have made headlines if Google and Yahoo were not affected by ratings? I am not sure why people are comparing apple with oranges and saying Florida Oranges are juicer than Washington State apples. Wow! that was strange.

Portal and Search are two different technologies. The truth is that Google had already taken giant leap ahead of its competitors in search technology in early 2001 and since then rest of herd is just trying to catch up with it. Portal has never been Google forte, though it had tried various variations with the personalized iGoogle Portal. Yahoo has always been good in portals, in fact it's Yahoo! Finance has been more respected and used financial portal. Recently they have given new look to their Portal and Mail platforms. Yahoo is doing great work in search but I still feel they have lot to do to catch up with Google. Recently they added search suggestion which Google had for a long time. It is a good start by nowhere at the same level of Google suggestions.

I personally use Yahoo for portal, Google for search, and Google & Yahoo for mail. Not because I am Google fan or Yahoo loyalist, but for what they do best. Besides, there is also brand loyalty and inertia to hold back in using new products with the consumers. The reasons why MSN has same points even though there hasn't been any product from Microsoft which has attracted anyone attention in search area.

What is it for Google, Yahoo and consumers after this survey? Google already knows if they need to stay ahead of race, they need to keep inventing and bring new technology innovations. Google is second name of search. People recognize Google with search innovations and have high expectations. Would there be further decline in Google numbers next year and what if? Since I do not rate these number very highly, I do not think Google should care. It kind of echoed in their response to these reports. But number can trigger some fluctuations in the stock prices, but momentarily. But it must have been a champagne day at Yahoo, beating Google after a long time in their own territory. The credit must go to Yahoo, they have been working hard to bridge the gap between their and Google search engines. I wish them good luck, it is competition that will keep Google on it feet, always guessing. Now most important, what is there for me, the consumer? Being a consumer is the easiest thing, need to use the technology and give the ratings. I see them having lot of responsibility in guiding these technologies with their needs and expectations. The consumers are the one who decides who will succeed based on who will fulfill the needs and requirements. I do not think these rating will impact Google and Yahoo's road map for the future, but certainly intrigued the bloggers to write.

Monday, July 30, 2007

Google gets straight with Autonomy

There have been numerous debates on the capabilities of Google as an truly effective enterprise search engine. I have read also that some of the largest enterprises are thinking of replacing or actually replacing Google as their enterprise search. I came to know that Cisco is one of them. On the other side, I also have seen organizations replacing other enterprise search engines with Google Appliance citing relevance as one of their concerns. NASA is one to replace Verity with Google Appliance on their portal.

The reasons as I know, why Google has not been taken seriously in enterprise search were:
1. Google Appliance search is not as effective as their web search. People are used to of using Google web search.
2. Google enterprise search are only able to index web pages, not databases, file systems etc.
3. Google enterprise search is not secured

There may be other reasons, but these are the one that I have heard and read more frequently.

Autonomy blasted Google on some of the limitation that have been listed above in their white paper which was published sometime ago. Also read Google has 'dumbed-down search', says Autonomy boss. The reasons, Autonomy feels threatened by Google enterprise search capability which is growing at the phenomenon rate. I do not have exact figures, but it seems Google already has over 9000 customers and lead the enterprise search market segment.

In the response to the allegations, Google published Don't believe everything you read on their enterprise blog. I think it would clear doubts in minds of readers who read the white paper and more so believed in what was written. I do not blame the readers as not all of them get chance to try new technology as it evolves or progresses. They believe in what is printed. Google did great job in responding to all the issues in details.

I need to ask Autonomy that why they are targeting Google alone, why not compare it with our world class search engines. Secondly, not long time ago Autonomy refused to even consider Google in the same league, why now.

I think this war of words will do lot of good to Google and its credibility as enterprise search engine.